True that! Stock vs. stock the Mustang puts out better performance stats in 0-60 and 1/4 mile.

 

here is a video of two cars with the winning car has 85 hp less then the losing car, stats don't happen here.
http://videos.streetfire.net/hottest...3059263641.htm

 

Im not talking about the ****ing hp. my ****ing 0-60 and quarter mile time are both ****ing faster. my 0-60 is 1.1 seconds faster. and my quarter mile is like 2 seconds faster.

 

If your quarter mile time is 2 seconds faster why do you ask which would win? BTW those jettas arent slow and your gt isnt better than 14.5 that jetta is faster than 16's.

 

[sm=thanx.gif]

 

This website lists the performance specs for the Jetta at the bottom of the page.
http://autos.msn.com/research/vip/Sp...etta&trimid=-1

0-60 is 7.45 and 1/4 mile is 15.72 - pretty snappy for a small car.

A stock Mustang from the mid 90's should handle it, but stevo0438 brings up a great point. If the stats are heavy in yor favor don't bother asking who will win, go ahead and show the person your car is faster!

 

anyone who says that theres no turbo lag on a jetta is talking out of his anus, it doesn't matter what you have, any car with a turbo will experience turbo lag

 

That is true. All turbos have lag. I have a buddy with a Buick Grand National and we used to press in the brake and the gas petal before launching so the turbo would spool up and there wouldn't be any initial lag once he did launch. That was a fast car...

[sm=gears.gif]